An interesting solution

An interesting op-ed in today's New York Times raises the idea of repealing the 22nd Amendment as a means of ensuring performance and accountability in second-term Administrations. The authors note:

[W]hether or not a president has a diminished second term, the amendment barring a third term presents the broader and more serious question of his accountability to the people.

While political commentators analyze every twist in White House politics, while citizens follow dramatic stories of leaks, investigations and indictments, the one person who does not have to care is George W. Bush. In a sense, he has transcended the risks and rewards of American politics. He will not run again for office. The voters will not be able to thank him - or dump him.

And yet accountability to the people is at the heart of a democratic system.

Certainly, the shocking hubris displayed by Mr. Bush as of late would seem to confirm this analysis. His defiant attitude, toward both Congress and the American people, is clearly indicative of a person "who does not have to care" whether or not his actions meet with widespread approval. And with a GOP-controlled House and Senate that are unlikely to pursue impeachment, and the absence of any Constitutional procedure for an Executive recall election, the current Administration is accountable to no one but itself.

Repeal of the 22nd Amendment could be an interesting solution to consider for preventing just such an attitude of impunity in future Administrations. And maybe, while we're at it, the time has come to add a Presidential recall option as well.