November 09, 2008

Waiting for a leader

Courtesy of The New York Times' always wonderful Frank Rich:
For eight years, we’ve been told by those in power that we are small, bigoted and stupid - easily divided and easily frightened. This was the toxic catechism of Bush-Rove politics. It was the soiled banner picked up by the sad McCain campaign, and it was often abetted by an amen corner in the dominant news media. We heard this slander of America so often that we all started to believe it, liberals most certainly included...

The actual real America is everywhere. It is the America that has been in shell shock since the aftermath of 9/11, when our government wielded a brutal attack by terrorists as a club to ratchet up our fears, betray our deepest constitutional values and turn Americans against one another in the name of "patriotism." What we started to remember the morning after Election Day was what we had forgotten over the past eight years, as our abusive relationship with the Bush administration and its press enablers dragged on: That’s not who we are.

So even as we celebrated our first black president, we looked around and rediscovered the nation that had elected him. "We are the ones we've been waiting for," Obama said in February, and indeed millions of such Americans were here all along, waiting for a leader. This was the week that they reclaimed their country.
"Waiting for a leader." That pretty much sums it up for me. My joy is unabated that in the transformational Barack Obama, we the people have finally found that individual.

^return to top

Here we go!

From WaPo:
Transition advisers to President-elect Barack Obama have compiled a list of about 200 Bush administration actions and executive orders that could be swiftly undone to reverse White House policies on climate change, stem cell research, reproductive rights and other issues...
Thank heavens. Time to hit the ground running and undo at least some of the damage done by George the Younger and his drooling disciples.

^return to top

November 06, 2008

A New Dawn

"President-elect Barack Hussein Obama..." Frankly, I'm still in such a state of euphoria every time I hear a variation of those words, I don't know what to write. It's my guess that it will be several more days before I'll be able to put my thoughts and emotions into some sort of coherent prose.

Suffice it to say that I can once again feel proud of America. I've dreamed of this day since I first saw the young Senator from Illinois speak at the DNC four years ago. That this dream has come to pass seems somehow like a miracle, yet, at the same time, like an inevitable event whose time had most certainly come.

God bless Barack Obama for giving us hope once again, for allowing us to dare to envision a new dawn for our reeling nation. That's all I've got for now - time to cry tears of joy and pride a little while longer...

^return to top

October 21, 2008

Brilliant

No preamble. Just watch and be amazed.

^return to top

October 04, 2008

Changing the subject

Golly. You die-hard Rethuglicans must be so proud of your "honorable" candidate. You must really believe in the appeal of your Party's policies. You must truly be committed to that whole "change" thing Captain John and Saint Sarah of Wasilla keep mentioning.

I mean, what better way to demonstrate those beliefs and commitments than by employing the same Rove-ian dirty tactics of character assassination, misdirection, and outright lying as the current Chimp in Chief did during 2000 and 2004? From WaPo:
Sen. John McCain and his Republican allies are readying a newly aggressive assault on Sen. Barack Obama's character, believing that to win in November they must shift the conversation back to questions about the Democrat's judgment, honesty and personal associations, several top Republicans said...

"We're going to get a little tougher," a senior Republican operative said, indicating that a fresh batch of television ads is coming. "We've got to question this guy's associations. Very soon. There's no question that we have to change the subject here."
"No question that we have to change the subject..." At last, a glimmer of honesty from the GOP. Damn right you have to change the subject. After the things you've done to our once-great nation, what else have you got?

^return to top

October 03, 2008

A vote for peace

As we ponder the theatrical "implications" of last night's VP debate - and collectively worry about the tumbling economy and our individual abilities to just stay afloat - it's necessary to remember the big-ticket item at the top of the Republican legacy. You know, that unprecedented, unjustified, unforgivable jaunt down Baghdad way. The very thing that defines the word "American" to a majority of the world.

So I turn this afternoon to blogger tristero at Hullabaloo, who, in the midst of a well-deserved critique of The New Yorker, sums it all up for me...
Regardless, I cannot let the following slide without comment:
There is still disagreement about the wisdom of overthrowing Saddam Hussein and his horrific regime...
Sorry, Mr. and Ms. New Yorker, but among people with working brains and souls, there is no - zero, zip, nada - disagreement. It was a screaming yellow bonkers idea. More importantly, it was an insane idea back in '02 and it was still irredeemably crazy in '03 when you shamefully endorsed it.

And no, I won't forget about it. And no, I won't get over it. Ever.

But look, I know my unrelenting anger at liberal hawks doesn't matter in the slightest. It is the dead that matter, and the mutilated, and the tortured. And they are all that matter.

So, dammit, the least the New Yorker could do is not try to finesse things. Not "over 4000" American troops as the New Yorker so roundly puts it, but close to 4200 troops have died because of this insane war, a war enabled by the support of folks like The New Yorker's editor, not to mention the silence of most of the rest of the liberals/moderates cowering in the interstices of the Bush-licking mass media. And not "tens of thousands" Iraqis, but nearly 100,000 confirmed pointless Iraqi deaths, and if you think that's even close to the real total you're being unreasonably optimistic. And let's not forget: While Bush had a few foolish partners in all this murderous stupidity, the blame is all America's.

It was unimaginable, unspeakable back in '03? Nonsense. It was easily imagined and many spoke up. In fact, the great majority of the world foresaw this awful tragedy, including millions upon millions of sensible Americans, including - to his everlasting credit - Barack Obama.
This election is about many things. As I'm fond of reminding everyone around me, it is, at its very core, a battle for the soul of America. It is about the kind of image we wish to establish in this new millennium.

But November 4th is overridingly about one thing which eclipses health-care and energy independence and creating jobs and women's rights and whatever issue du jour is grabbing the full attention of our impotent 4th Estate. It is about war and the consequences of a national policy built upon war as the 1st solution to all the world's ills.

A vote for John McCain is a vote for war. A vote for Barack Obama is a vote for peace. It's really that simple, kids.

I know which way I'm leaning...

^return to top

October 02, 2008

Eloquence

Maybe there is hope for our future. Via HuffPo, this beautiful post from 15-year-old Obama volunteer Cassie Goldring:
I am a fifteen-year-old girl who is a spectator in this election, for I am unable to vote due to my age which is why I write this to you.

On November 4th, 2008, you will be deciding the future of our country. When you elect our next president of the United States, you are not only choosing the individual who will lead our country for the next 4 (maybe 8) years, but you are deciding what the future of our country is going to be like; how our country will change, or won't. This election is not a matter of gender, race, age or religion, this is a matter of we as Americans understanding that we can no longer sit by as spectators and allow leaders such as George W. Bush to command our country...

This is a new world from the one that my parents and grandparents grew up in, a place in which we do not judge people based on the color of their skin, but only on who they are as people and on their character. We need a President who sees the world through my generation's eyes because this is the world that we will soon inherit and have to ourselves lead. We are the ones who will inherit the economic debt that the George W. Bush administration has currently left us in. We are the ones who will have to repair the rapidly deteriorating Earth, and we are the ones who will have to deal with the consequences of two mismanaged wars.
Out of the mouths of babes... If only every voter were as reasoned and well-informed as she.

^return to top

The real John McCain

A must-read from Tim Dickinson at Rolling Stone about John McCain's "disturbing record of recklessness and dishonesty." Excerpt:
This is the story of the real John McCain, the one who has been hiding in plain sight. It is the story of a man who has consistently put his own advancement above all else, a man willing to say and do anything to achieve his ultimate ambition: to become commander in chief, ascending to the one position that would finally enable him to outrank his four-star father and grandfather.

In its broad strokes, McCain's life story is oddly similar to that of the current occupant of the White House. John Sidney McCain III and George Walker Bush both represent the third generation of American dynasties. Both were born into positions of privilege against which they rebelled into mediocrity. Both developed an uncanny social intelligence that allowed them to skate by with a minimum of mental exertion. Both struggled with booze and loutish behavior. At each step, with the aid of their fathers' powerful friends, both failed upward. And both shed their skins as Episcopalian members of the Washington elite to build political careers as self-styled, ranch-inhabiting Westerners who pray to Jesus in their wives' evangelical churches.

^return to top

Shameful

Sadly, I'm not surprised that this shameful story hasn't gotten any media attention whatsoever. From Chris Rodda at Daily KOS:
On Friday, September 26, the end of a week in which thousands of copies of "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West" -- the fear-mongering, anti-Muslim documentary being distributed by the millions in swing states via DVDs inserted in major newspapers and through the U.S. mail -- were distributed by mail in Ohio, a "chemical irritant" was sprayed through a window of the Islamic Society of Greater Dayton, where 300 people were gathered for a Ramadan prayer service. The room that the chemical was sprayed into was the room where babies and children were being kept while their mothers were engaged in prayers. This, apparently, is what the scare tactic political campaigning of John McCain's supporters has led to -- Americans perpetrating a terrorist attack against innocent children on American soil.
Good God, people - is this the kind of "America" we want in the new millennium?

^return to top

September 30, 2008

Uh, run that by me one more time...

OK, now I'm really confused...

Courtesy of Laura Rosen at War and Peace, this little tidbit from Bloomberg.com:
The Federal Reserve will pump an additional $630 billion into the global financial system, flooding banks with cash to alleviate the worst banking crisis since the Great Depression.

The Fed increased its existing currency swaps with foreign central banks by $330 billion to $620 billion to make more dollars available worldwide...

"Today's blast of term liquidity will settle the funding markets down, and allow trust to slowly be restored between borrowers and lenders," said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York.
So, what gives?

Does this mean that the "experts" we've been hearing from were revealing only half the total required to prevent "Hooverville, Part Deux"? Does this mean that Bush-appointee Hank Paulson was somehow unaware that the Fed could inject this cash into the market, regardless of Congressional action?

Does this mean that the $700 billion in taxpayer money specified by the "bailout" wasn't really necessary after all?

Whew - glad THAT's behind us!

^return to top

September 27, 2008

Missing in action

Please, Republicans (and I count many among my friends and family, believe it or not), pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease just be honest and end this embarrassing love affair with Saint Sarah of Wasilla. Good God, where was she last night while Joe Biden was demonstrating (on practically every channel) that he's absolutely ready to assume the office of Vice President?!

Even you, my conservative lemmings, have got to admit that this continued avoidance of the press is not only disturbing, but inexcusable.

^return to top

September 24, 2008

Hating America

You know, I really don't want to seem petty. But when dealing with petty and small-minded people (i.e. modern Republicans), pettiness is quite often the only gesture they're able to comprehend.

In that light, I offer up the following, full-page picture of Saint Sarah of Wasilla which appeared in the September 13th print edition of Newsweek magazine...

I've long complained about Bush-era conservatives who "wrap themselves in the flag" while desecrating the ideals which that flag represents. Apparently, the Alaska Governor decided that, for her feature article in one of America's leading newsmagazines, it would be a good idea to take that philosophy from the merely metaphorical to the gallingly literal.

Just a gesture to energize the "base," I suppose.

One tiny little technical problem, though. Apparently, this most visible mouthpiece for the "country first" crowd overlooked the fact that her choice of wardrobe violates the United States Code Title 4 Chapter 1 - The Flag. According to Section 8d, "The flag should never be used as wearing apparel... It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free."

All of which makes me wonder: Why does Sarah Palin hate America?

OK, OK. As I admitted up front, I would ordinarily hesitate to be so petty. It's just that, not so long ago, Saint Sarah's own Party and supporters tried to whip up public sentiment against Senator Obama over his well-reasoned decision to stop wearing a flag pin on his lapel. Hysterical conservatives called his very patriotism into question over the insignificant absence of jewelry arbitrarily affixed to his clothing, frightening a compliant media to join in the chorus of doubt about the Senator's allegiance to America itself.

As if those ubiquitous magnetic ribbons plastered onto the back of your SUV meant a damn thing about your devotion to the principles of democracy in the first place.

Imagine, for a moment, if Mr. Obama released a similar photo of himself wrapped in the ol' RedWhiteandBlue. I guarantee there'd be an outcry of protest from the Right so loud and self-righteous it wouldn't dissipate for months. And I'm sure some clever student of Rovian politics would point out the fact that the Illinois Senator was willfully violating that Flag Code, once again denigrating his patriotism.

Petty? Sure. But what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Looks like respect for the American flag is just one more thing that Mrs. Palin currently knows nothing about.

^return to top

Random words of wisdom...

A hat tip to Worldwide Sawdust for this sobering - and accurate - indictment of the architects of the Iraq "war" from Spanish Judge Baltasar Garzon:
Breaking every international law, and under the pretext of the war against terror, there has taken place since 2003 a devastating attack on the rule of law and against the very essence of the international community. In its path, institutions such as the United Nations were left in tatters, from which it has not yet recovered...

We should look more deeply into the possible criminal responsibility of the people who are, or were, responsible for this war and see whether there is sufficient evidence to make them answer for it...There is enough of an argument in 650,000 deaths for this investigation and inquiry to start without more delay.
- - -

From The Demon Princess at MoronCowboy, a few choice words for Congress to remember as it confronts, well, everything that the lame-duck Administration is trying to sneak through:
"Centrism" is not a political position so much as it is a survival strategy, a way of treading water while unbelievably vicious and nasty rightwingers have made of EVERYTHING a partisan issue. WAKE UP! The worst of them are gone now, marginalized, their theories and dire predictions completely discredited, having left everything in utter disarray. There could not be a better time to begin to turn things around, while the memories are fresh and the detritus lies in heaps around our feet.

Instead we get Dems who've internalized the empty rhetoric of their abusers and can't seem to find the courage to do anything more than tinker at the edges of disastrous neocon policy...
- - -

Via Daily KOS, contributor Hunter weighs in on the just-released conservative Republican counterproposal to the bailout:
By what possible measure could anyone honestly believe that the solution to this crisis is to eliminate the capital gains tax on corporations and the wealthy? The only thing I can come up with is that the purveyors of this nonsense are goddamn, no good, flim-flamming bullshitting soulless America-hating megacrooks who have absolutely no interest in anything except getting a narrow class of people out of paying their damn taxes -- and are willing to scream "Depression!" at everyone if they don't get it.

Whoever wrote this alternative "plan" shouldn't merely be fired -- they should be fired into the sun.
'Nuff said.

^return to top

September 23, 2008

Essential

I've long been an admirer of essayist Larisa Alexandrovna. Perhaps the fact that she was born in Odessa has made her uniquely appreciative of the ideals of American democracy, moreso than those of us "natives" to whom the precious freedoms of our nation are taken for granted.

Her latest post at HuffPo is no exception. Addressing the impending financial bailout being proposed by the Bushies, Ms. Alexandrovna writes:
As I see it now, we have but two options and I have long alluded to hoping against hope that one of these options would not be the only one left to a peaceful people. The first and frankly most preferable option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against the members of this latest Business Plot.

No time needs to be wasted on hearings as we already now have in writing, formally as presented to Congress, the intentions of this administration to nullify Congressional powers permanently, to alter Judicial powers permanently, and to openly steal public funds using as blackmail the total collapse of the US economy if these powers are not handed over...

The other option, the one I have long prayed we would never need to even consider, is a total revolution. But, if Congress won't act in its own self-defense, in the defense of democracy, in defense of us - the people who have elected them to protect us from this very danger - then what is left for us to do? I don't want to see it come down to this, but I fear that it will. Put your party politics aside right now. We are in a crisis so dangerous that should these people succeed in their coup, your party affiliation will no longer matter, your American flag will be a nice collectible item of something that once was, and your version of God will be worshiped in secrecy because your freedoms will be owned by the few.

You are no longer Republicans, Democrats, or any shade of voter. You do not live in a swing state or a solid colored state. You are simply this: an American. That is the only side that matters... Pick a side, because there won't be another time, another moment, another chance to be a patriot.
In a similar way, I have said and written for years that the very soul of our great American experiment has been under relentless attack during the disastrous reign of George the Younger - and that we are but one small step from open revolution. I, for one, have never felt more strongly that I cannot even recognize my country any longer, so twisted and distorted has the image of "America" become under its current stewards.

And as a person who lived through the tumultuous, war-torn, assassination-marred '60s, that's saying a LOT.

Contact your elected representatives and demand that they finally take one last stand against the theocratic dictatorship our Imbecile in Chief has slowly but surely tried to build on the ashes of the Twin Towers. With another 118 days in office - and no approval ratings or reelection bid to restrain him - Junior shows signs of accelerating his assault on our Constitution, our standing in the world community, and our very way of life.

The time is now...

^return to top

September 17, 2008

Accountable

In a much-needed editorial today, the New York Times outlines one item that Speaker Nancy Pelosi must make a priority before Congress adjourns later this month:
Her list must include a vote to hold Karl Rove in contempt for his lawless decision to defy a Congressional subpoena to testify about the United States attorneys scandal. There is a vital national interest in getting to the bottom of this matter - and in not allowing Congress's authority to be undermined...

Congress's investigation of the United States attorneys matter is of the utmost importance. It now seems clear that the Justice Department under Attorney General Alberto Gonzales operated as a partisan political actor, using its prosecutorial authority to help the party in power win elections. That was a grave abuse, which undermined American democracy...

There are many vital principles at stake, but none is more important than the power of Congress itself. In this era of expanding presidential authority, Congress is a critical check on executive branch abuses. It cannot perform this function if it allows members of the executive branch to flout its subpoenas and its oversight.
To this date, not one of the members of King George's inner circle has been held accountable for his or her criminal behavior. Let's make sure that Ms. Pelosi gets the message loud and clear that it's time for the architects of Bush's abominable reign to answer for their malfeasance.

^return to top

September 15, 2008

Where's Waldo?

It occurs to me that even in the midst of Wall Street's meltdown today, the happiest individual in politics has got to be (drum roll please)...

George W. Bush.


Let's face it, with Saint Sarah of the North driving the current news cycle, and month upon month of non-stop Primary, Convention, and Election coverage permeating our every waking moment, I feel like I haven't really heard anything concerning our lame-duck, Frat Boy in Chief lately. Almost as if he's become so irrelevant that no one's really that concerned about keeping an eye on him.

And that should scare the absolute shit out of each and every one of us.

OK, I'm exaggerating somewhat for effect, but the genuinely frightening thing is that the continuing misdeeds of this disastrous President aren't the top story at 6:00 any more. Hell, they're not even the third or fourth.

And while I'll admit that the campaign is of major importance, the contenders (and the prime-time drama that goes with them) are not yet, well, um, actually doing anything except traveling and speech-a-fyin'. Mr. Bush, on the other hand, is acting out his Unitary Executive fantasies on a daily basis - and in a very real way. Making policy. Threatening invasion. Spying on Americans. Dismantling the Constitution.

Sending our children and spouses and friends and loved ones to die in an unnecessary war of his creation.

George the Younger still has 126 days left on the job. He's still eliminating time-honored checks and balances on Executive power. He's still making it easier for Americans to be wiretapped. He's still employing kidnapping, torture, and murder as tools in his mismanaged "War on Terror."

He's already launching non-sanctioned, alliance-threatening military attacks across Pakistan's sovereign border and rattling his saber once again toward Iran. These two things alone should trouble the populace tremendously (to say the least), and should in fact be a hot topic on the lips of the entire electorate.

Instead, the only lips involved for most of the woefully misdirected public are glossy and porcine.

I don't know about you, but I wanna know "Where's Waldo?" 126 days is a long time, and this guy hasn't done so well when all our eyes were on him. Imagine what Georgie can get away with if we allow too much of our focus to be directed only at his successors, forgetting that it's not Obama or McCain, but Bush who still has his finger on the button.

^return to top

I know, I know...

OK, I did promise not to say another word about Saint Sarah of the North, but this piece by the Daily News' Mike Lupica is certainly worth sharing. Excerpt:
Once people in this country who opposed the war in Iraq were called unpatriotic. Now if you criticize Gov. Palin, it is as if you want to fold the 19th Amendment into a paper airplane. So people from her side, starting with McCain's handlers, have made it out that she is a victim of sexism. Are they kidding? Sarah Palin ought to write sonnets on the subject, because it is sexism that has built a force field around her, for as long as it lasts.

There is no question that Palin has become the shooting star of this campaign, pun absolutely intended. In many ways, she already has done the job John McCain hired her to do, like she is part of some trick play in football, everybody watching her instead of the guy with the ball.

McCain, of course, is a trick play all by himself these days, trying to run against George Bush at the same time he brings in a running mate - Palin - who is so onboard with Bush's policies, on everything from God to guns to Iraq, she could pass for the third Bush daughter if she were a little younger.
Now that's it. Really. I promise.

^return to top

A new low

Among the several news items that caught my eye over the weekend, this one was the most infuriating. From Think Progress:
At the Values Voter Summit this weekend, vendors sold an item called "Obama Waffles" featuring a racist cartoon of Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) on the box front - with "popping eyes and big, thick lips" - and another image of him wearing an Arab-like headdress on its top flap.
Good God, Conservatives, have you no shame whatsoever?

The Washington Post also noted on Saturday:
While Obama Waffles takes aim at Obama's politics by poking fun at his public remarks and positions on issues, it also plays off the old image of the pancake-mix icon Aunt Jemima, which has been widely criticized as a demeaning stereotype...

Placing Obama in Arab-like headdress recalls the false rumor that he is a follower of Islam, though he is actually a Christian.

On the back of the box, Obama is depicted in stereotypical Mexican dress, including a sombrero, above a recipe for "Open Border Fiesta Waffles" that says it can serve "4 or more illegal aliens."
You know, for most of my adult life I've tried to be patient with Republicans, hoping against hope that the actions of the most radical among them do not reflect the mindset of the average, run-of-the-mill GOP member. Clinging to my belief that most people, even Conservatives, are generally decent and good at heart. Counting on that inherent decency to motivate Republican citizens to criticize unacceptable behavior even when it's done by one of their own.

But once again, the silence from the Conservative rank-and-file is deafening. Guess that means that this type of stunt is representative of the Party as a whole, and accurately summarizes the innermost thoughts of everyone who calls the GOP home.

You all make me sick.

That these obviously racist items were made available at a Values Voters forum is indicative of the type of "values" your twisted, disgusting Party holds dear. That your Republican leaders would openly tolerate such a thing while daring to cry "sexist" over the vetting of Saint Sarah is the height of odious hypocrisy.

That anyone in 21st-Century America would even contemplate defending this grievous offense makes me want to spit on each and every supporter of the GOP I might see on the street, if for nothing else than your silent complicity in sabotaging the true democratic ideals of this nation.

Sadly, as digby ruefully noted in a Saturday post:
There's nothing new in this. For years they've been selling buttons that say "Happiness is Hillary's face on a milk carton" at conservative confabs.
Driving the point home, digby's blog page then displayed a picture of a button that was recently being sold at the Texas Republican convention. Its message: "If Obama is President... will we still call it The White House?"

You despicable Right-wing assholes - are you fucking kidding me?!

Unless there's an immediate and overwhelming cry of "foul" from those of you who wear the Republican mantle proudly, then you all richly deserve to be tarred and feathered right along with your more visible compatriots. These messages of intolerance, bigotry, and hate have no place in an advanced, democratic society. They're a new - and ugly - low.

And for a Party defined by its low moments, that's saying one helluva lot.

^return to top

September 13, 2008

The "P"-word

I suppose it was inevitable, even though I swore I wouldn't contribute to